Wednesday, April 15, 2020
Boss Is Forcing Us to Be Liver Donors for His Brother
Boss Is Forcing Us to Be Liver Donors for His Brother Q: The owner of the company I work for, which has about 100 employees, has a brother who needs a liver transplant. Two weeks ago, a company-wide memo went out that all employees would be required to undergo testing to see if they were a suitable liver donor for the ownerâs brother. No exceptions. Iâm in remission for cancer and canât be an organ donor. What should I do? Last week the ownerâs assistant went around to schedule days off for everyone at one branch of the company so they could get tested. People who declined were let go. One of these people was born with liver disease and therefore ineligible to donate. She had a doctorâs note. Other people also had medical reasons as well and some were just uncomfortable with the request and didnât want to do it. One was pregnant. They were still terminated. My employerâs assistant has said that because our employment is at will, he can legally fire us. Iâm in remission from cancer. Iâm ineligible to donate and any kind of surgery would put a major strain on my system. Even if I was healthy, I would still object to possibly being forced into donating an organ just to keep my job. Soon they will be scheduling peopleâs days off for testing at my branch. I know this situation is nuts, but I donât know what to do. Read More: Iâm being penalized for not participating in monthly athletic events at work A: What the actual F. Heâs firing people who donât want to sign up to donate part of their liver? Your boss is both an absolute loon and an incredible jerk. Heâs also not very smart, since doctors wonât accept organ donations from people who arenât willingly and happily volunteering, so all of this ridiculousness will be for nothing. But letâs talk legality. I showed your letter to employment attorney Bryan Cavanaugh and asked him to weigh in. He says: This employer is violating the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). The ADAâs purpose is broader than just protecting individuals with disabilities from unlawful discrimination and requiring employers to offer individuals with disabilities reasonable accommodations to perform the essential functions of their jobs. The ADA also prohibits employers from requiring employees to submit to medical examinations and medical inquiries, unless those medical examinations and medical inquiries are job-related and consistent with business necessity. In this case, the employerâs requirement to undergo a medical examination (and presumably to undergo further medical procedures if the employee is a good match) has nothing to do with the business. It has nothing to do with the operations of the company and the employeesâ ability to perform their jobs. Therefore, the employer is violating the federal ADA (and probably other state and local laws) by requiring employees to undergo this testing (which is not job-related and not consistent with business necessity) and by terminating the employment of those who refuse. So to our ongoing list of your bossâs characteristics, which currently includes loon, jerk, and not smart, you can add law-breaker. As for what to do, you could have a lawyer explain this to your employer on your behalf, and/or file a complaint with the EEOC, the federal agency that enforces the ADA. (Note that you have to file it within 180 days from the violation.) But Iâd also start job searching. Even if this gets quickly settled, youâre working with someone who has such a skewed idea of the employment relationship that he thinks he has say over your internal organs. Get out get out get out. Read More: My manager spent the money from an office collection on herself Note: This situation is so outrageous that it occurred to me to wonder whether the letter is real or not. At this point, Iâve received so many credible stories of outrageous behavior by employers that Iâm willing to believe it and Iâm treating it as genuine (and the letter-writer included a note to me outside the letter here that makes me think itâs real), but the reality is that I have no way of knowing. Letter-writer, assuming you are real, take this as a measure of how messed up the situation is. Commenters, Iâm requesting that we not get derailed by debates about veracity. Thanks! Q: My boss is intense BFFs with my coworker I work for a very large Fortune 500 company. There is an HR policy in place regarding conflicts of interest for family members and opposite-sex relationships. However, there is not a policy regarding same-sex friendships. In my department, my manager and coworker have a very intense personal relationship (non-sexual). They work out together during the week and on weekends, they attend all sorts of sporting events, they dine together, they take expensive vacations together (spas/vacations out of the country â" one of which was financed by my manager), they text, they are in each otherâs offices all day, they take selfies and post them on Facebook, and they share clothing. It is a very close friendship. As a result, the coworker has a LOT of power in our group. She has unlimited access to our boss, and she is able to direct her own narrative. Our boss maintains that she can be objective. I disagree. There have been a number of instances where this coworkerâs behavior was excused instead of addressed. She can act, essentially, with impunity. My bossesâ boss knows about this friendship, and either hasnât or wonât address it. It could be that I have been existing in this dysfunctional environment for too long, but Iâm starting to think that maybe I am wrong. Is this a conflict or am I off base? Read More: My boss and my coworker are living together A: No, itâs a huge conflict! You donât have to be having sex with someone to have inappropriate biased in their favor or to be perceived as having inappropriate bias in their favor. Occasionally working out together or dining together? Not a big deal on its own. But hanging out on weekends, vacationing together (!), sharing clothing (!), and all the rest? A huge deal. A huge, massive, ridiculous, complete abdication of your managerâs job. Sheâs far, far over the line of whatâs appropriate. No one looking at that would believe that she can be unbiased or objective about your coworker, which means that sheâs not able to do her job. As for what to do ⦠if her boss knows and wonât address it (huge failure on her part too), there might not be much you can do. You could talk to your boss or her boss and explain how the dynamic is impacting your department, but Iâm skeptical that the friendship would actually get dialed back to an appropriate level (i.e., about 5% of where it is currently) without a serious mandate from someone above her who truly sees why this is completely not okay. These questions are adapted from ones that originally appeared on Ask a Manager. Some have been edited for length.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.